Agricultural Bank of China Fined $215 million for Violating New York Anti-Money Laundering Laws

New York– Agricultural Bank of China (the Bank) will pay a $215 million penalty and install an independent monitor for violating New York’s anti-money laundering laws. Financial Services Superintendent Maria T. Vullo made this announcement today. The fine is part of a consent order entered into with the Department of Financial Services (DFS) pursuant to which the Bank shall take immediate steps to correct violations, including engaging an independent monitor reporting directly to DFS to address serious deficiencies within the bank’s compliance program and implement effective anti-money laundering controls.

The DFS investigation discovered intentional wrongdoing, including actions by bank officials to obfuscate U.S. dollar transactions conducted through the New York Branch that might reveal violations of sanctions or anti-money laundering laws. The Bank also silenced and severely curtailed the independence of the Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) at the New York Branch, who tried to raise serious concerns to Branch management and conduct internal investigations regarding suspicious activity, leading the CCO to ultimately resign.

DFS examiners found that the New York Branch of Agricultural Bank of China has conducted U.S. dollar clearing in rapidly increasing volumes since 2013 through foreign correspondent accounts, even after DFS warned the Bank not to increase its dollar clearing transactions until it significantly improved its compliance function. The Bank willfully ignored DFS’s warning and dollar clearing transactions by the Bank at the New York Branch skyrocketed in 2014 and 2015, creating an untenable risk at a time when the Bank was not able to satisfy even basic compliance requirements.

The Bank also was found to employ non-transparent and evasive transaction methods, including sending coded messages through the Society of Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) system that masked the true parties to a transaction and avoided screening by DFS. The SWIFT wire message system permits bank compliance staff to screen and monitor transactions in compliance with BSA/AML requirements, OFAC regulations, and the requirements of DFS and other regulators.

Compliance personnel at the New York Branch also discovered alarming transaction patterns, including:

  • Unusually large round dollar transfers between Chinese and Russian companies;
  • Unusually large round dollar payments from Yemen to companies in China;
  • Potentially suspicious dollar denominated payments from trading companies located in the Middle East;
  • Dollar transactions remitted by a Turkish Bank customer for its Afghan Bank client which is known by the U.S. Treasury Department for its associations with a Hawala network having associations with narcotics traffickers and illicit cash flows; and
  • Certain invoices involving China and Russia appeared to be counterfeit or falsified, while other documents suggested U.S. dollar trades with Iranian counterparties – including documentation indicating dollar transactions were made for the benefit of a sanctioned Iranian party – information that had been omitted from the SWIFT wire messaging.

Under the consent order, Agricultural Bank of China will retain and install an independent monitor within sixty days of its selection by DFS for two years to conduct a comprehensive review of the effectiveness of the Branch’s program for compliance with the BSA/AML requirements and the state laws and regulations.

The Independent Monitor will also conduct a review of the New York Branch’s U.S. dollar clearing transaction activity from May 1, 2014 through October 31, 2015, to determine, among other things, whether transactions inconsistent with or in violation of the OFAC Regulations, or suspicious activity involving high risk customers or transactions or possible money laundering at, by, or through the Branch, were properly identified and reported in accordance with the OFAC Regulations and suspicious activity reporting regulations and New York law. Findings by the Independent Monitor as a result of the 18-month look-back could subject the Bank to additional enforcement action. The Independent Monitor will be selected by and report directly to DFS.